震驚:《立場新聞》案法官承認裁決缺乏明確法律依據

回覆文章
emily
文章: 19507
註冊時間: 週五 6月 24, 2022 7:01 am

震驚:《立場新聞》案法官承認裁決缺乏明確法律依據

文章 emily »

震驚:《立場新聞》案法官承認裁決缺乏明確法律依據

在一個驚人的發展中,法官郭偉健在《立場新聞》案中不僅推翻了自己先前的裁決,還承認了這一裁決缺乏明確的法律依據。

重點摘要:
• 郭官擴大了煽動罪的定義範圍
• 承認新定義並非基於現有法律,而是為了"有效維護國家安全"
• 將犯罪意圖從「蓄意煽動」擴大至「罔顧煽動後果」

這意味著什麼?
• 新聞工作者可能因缺乏明確法律依據的裁決而入獄
• 對香港法治和司法獨立提出嚴重質疑
• 新聞自由和言論自由面臨前所未有的威脅

這項裁決不僅影響《立場新聞》案,更可能對香港的整個新聞業和法律體系產生深遠影響。

#香港法律危機 #新聞自由岌岌可危 #立場新聞案
附加檔案
2024-09-01 11.30.35.jpg
2024-09-01 11.30.35.jpg (217.29 KiB) 已瀏覽 92 次
2024-09-01 11.30.59.jpg
2024-09-01 11.30.59.jpg (154.33 KiB) 已瀏覽 92 次
2024-09-01 11.30.13.jpg
2024-09-01 11.30.13.jpg (93.62 KiB) 已瀏覽 92 次
emily
文章: 19507
註冊時間: 週五 6月 24, 2022 7:01 am

Re: 震驚:《立場新聞》案法官承認裁決缺乏明確法律依據

文章 emily »

Shocking: Judge in Stand News Case Admits Ruling Lacks Clear Legal Basis

In a stunning development, Judge Kwok Wai-kin has not only reversed his previous ruling in the Stand News case but also admitted that this new decision lacks a clear legal foundation.

Key points:
• Judge Kwok broadened the definition of sedition
• He acknowledged the new definition isn't based on existing law, but aims to "effectively safeguard national security"
• Criminal intent expanded from "intentional incitement" to include "disregarding consequences of incitement"

What does this mean?
• Journalists may face imprisonment based on rulings without clear legal basis
• Serious questions raised about Hong Kong's rule of law and judicial independence
• Unprecedented threat to press freedom and freedom of expression

This ruling not only affects the Stand News case but could have far-reaching implications for Hong Kong's entire journalism industry and legal system.

#HongKongLegalCrisis #StandNewsCase
回覆文章

回到「新聞」